I started my graduate studies a few years ago thinking not much was published in the field of cyber conflict. I quickly found my assumption was wrong when I optimistically began a systematic literature review of ‘all’ the relevant works in the field. It was a project I had to abandon after a few weeks (although I do believe that more reviews like this should be conducted).
Even though it is true that still not enough has been published in the top academic journals, one can hardly say that people don’t write on ‘cyber’. With relevant readings currently being scattered across journal articles, books, blog posts, news articles, cyber security firm reports, and more, it becomes increasingly difficult to know what’s out there and build upon earlier insights and arguments published by others.
Whereas this has led some ( Oxford Bibliographies Project and State of the Field of Conference 2016) to direct efforts towards finding the ‘core’ of the field – focusing on key readings – I have started a complimentary ‘Cyber References Project’ with as aim to be much more inclusive.
The database currently includes about 800-1000 readings (and also lists a few podcasts and documentaries), which I have sorted into 48 categories. The categories are not mutually exclusive. The goal is not to search based on author (or title) like conventional search engines.
This database includes the references listed on various cyber security course syllabi, State of the Field of Conference 2016, Oxford Bibliographies Project, SSRN, Google Scholar, Oxford SOLO, PhD-Manuscripts, and think-tank search engines.
Where I see this project going: I plan to include another 150+ academic articles & 200+ blog posts in the near future. I also hope to improve formatting and sort the current list of readings (by year & add categories). In addition, Olivia Lau maintains a great notes/summary pool of key readings on International Relations. It would be great if we could establish something similar for cyber conflict.
Please let me know if readings are missing or categorized incorrectly. Of course, any ideas on how to make this platform easier to use are also very welcome.